Good Practices
👷♂️ Good Practices for Monkey Patching
Monkey patching is a powerful tool, but with great power comes great responsibility! 🕷️ Here are some best practices to ensure your patches are safe, maintainable, and effective.
Use Sparingly
Monkey patching should be a last resort, not a go-to solution. Always consider alternatives like:
- Wrappers: Create a wrapper function or class around the original code.
- Middleware: Use middleware patterns to extend functionality.
- Pull Requests: Contribute fixes or features directly to the library. Why? Overusing patches can make your codebase harder to maintain and debug.
Document Your Patches
Follow the 3W rule:
- Why the patch was applied.
- What the patch does.
- When it was added and by whom.
Example:
Test Thoroughly
- Isolate Patches: Test patches in isolation to ensure they work as expected.
- Edge Cases: Test edge cases to catch unexpected behavior.
- Integration Tests: Ensure patches don’t break other parts of the application. Why? Patches can introduce subtle bugs that are hard to detect.
Unpatch When Done
Always restore the original behavior when the patch is no longer needed.
Use Tusk’s unpatch
method to clean up.
Communicate with Your Team
- Code Reviews: Discuss patches during code reviews to ensure they’re necessary and well-implemented.
- Documentation: Share documentation about patches with your team.
- Naming Conventions: Use clear naming conventions for patched methods (e.g.,
_patchedMethod
).
Avoid Side Effects
- Global Changes: Be cautious when patching global objects (e.g., Array.prototype).
- Third-Party Libraries: Avoid patching third-party libraries unless absolutely necessary.
- Performance: Ensure patches don’t introduce performance bottlenecks.
🧠 Pro Tip ╺╸ Document every patch and its purpose—future you (and your team) will thank you!